I've been looking all over the internet to find out which media player can play my media files without hurting my system performance which is very important when you are doing some CPU/Memory intensive work and needs to listen music as well. I dint get a very good search result which compare them based on their performance. So I'm writing my own results may be it will help someone choose their media player. Right now I have two P4 3.4, 512 MB RAM, 120 GB HDD. Lots of msngr running. 2 IE 7 Window opened (12 tabs) and this Word 2007 window. Media Player Memory consumption on start Avg. Memory consumption Windows Media Player 11 30 MB 22 MB FooBar2000 0.9.4.3 9 MB 11 MB GMplayer (MPlayer with GUI) 19 MB 26 MB MPlayer console 5 MB 5 MB Please post your statistics so that I can update the list and perhaps someone else could seek help from it. I'll be updating the list as soon as I get my hands on other media players. But I guess FooBar2000 is pretty light-weight and get my preference over other when I'm low on system resources. BTW: Streaming music from internet is better in terms of performance but quality is not that great. Tips: WMP eats up loads of memory if you open it in library mode. Keep it in No Visualization mode with Now playing window opened and it will perform better. My personal favorite is WMP11 when I work on my 2GB - x64 Dual Core. Thanks go to:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=74636
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_media_players
Home » Unlabelled » Media Player Performance
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Media Player Performance
Related Posts
Author : Smoke'N Ashes // 2:12 AM
Category:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
and if you know some s/w things u must know that the actual performance may differ based on the format of song u r playing and when did u calculate the memory usage. when changing songs it should consume a lil bit more memory than in normal playback.
Post a Comment